Two Theories of Literacy Development

In this task I am going to identify 2 different theories of spoken verbiage emergence I am going to be doing, Naom Chomsky and Jean Pia fare. Jean Piaget According to Piaget, phrase machinatement is related to cognitive development, that is, the development of the childs thought process determines when the child clear learn to intercommunicate and what the child can say. For ideal, before a child can say, This teddy is sm solelyer than that one, she/he must have developed the ability to judge differences in size.In Piagets view, children learn to c totally down by nature when they be shit without any deliberate teaching by adults he thinks children pick up language by repeated behavior. From doing his research into childrens language and how they think, Piaget put his theory on the idea that children do non think like adults he thought that they learnt through with(predicate) schemas which is repeatable behaviour which you unwrap in children as they play and then Pia get thought that through their play and inter legal actions with their surroundings children build up their give understanding of the world.And Piaget thinks language development comes from logical thinking and reasoning skills. Schemas Schemas are patterns of repeatable behaviour which you big businessman see children do everyday through play and on step forwardments I have seen children do things on placements. Schema Transporting I have seen or so children when Ive been at placement doing this e. g. when they carry blocks from one place to another either in a bag or trolley or when they take rational from the sand tray to the sensory area this is transporting. Rotation this is when children are fascinated by things spinning e. . the washing mould or anything with wheels they like rolling things down a hill and children enjoy spinning around or being swung around. An example of how children could learn language though schemas could be, if a chid is rolling or pushing a toy c ar along the floor. And it goes under the sofa they leave behind say something like oh or its gone(a) only as they do it more and more and they have influence through the environment they get out become more advance in there language and later on the child will be ale to identify that its gone under the sofa.Piaget thinks children pass through 4 distinct academic degrees sensory motor, pre-operational concrete operational formal operational. Sensory-Motor Period According to Piagets theory he thinks children are born with canonic action schemas such as sucking and grasping. The sensory-motor period starts from birth to 2 years. This is when the children are doing their basic action schemas to take in information about the world. Piaget describes two functions of childrens language the egoist and the socialized. During the sensory-motor period, childrens language is egocentric they talk either for themselves or for the pleasure of associating anyone who happens to be there with the action of the moment. This stage involves the put on of motor activity without the use of symbols. K straightwayledge is limited in this stage, because it is based on physical interactions and experiences. Infants cannot predict reaction, and therefore must constantly experiment and learn through trial and error. Such exploration might include shakiness a rattle or putting objects in the mouth. As they become more mobile, infants ability to develop cognitively increases.Early language development begins during this stage. Children show that they know objects are yet the when they cant see them at 7-9 months, demonstrating that memory is developing. Infants realize that an object exists after it can no longer be seen. The pre-operational stage usually occurs amid toddlerhood (18-24months) and early childhood (7 years). During this stage children begin to use language memory and vagary also develop. In the pre-operational stage, children engage in make believe and can unde rstand and express relationships between the past and the future.More complex concepts, such as cause and effect relationships, have not been learned. Intelligence is egocentric and spontaneous, not logical. The Concrete Operations fix up, this stage was believed to have affected children aged between s even out and football team to twelve years old. During this stage, the thought answer becomes more rational, mature and adult like, or more operational, although this process most often continues well into the teenage years. Piaget claims that before the beginning of this stage, childrens ideas about different objects, are ormed and predominate by the appearance of the object. For example, there appears to be more blocks when they are spread out, than when they are in a small pile. During the Concrete Operational Stage, children gradually develop the ability to conserve, or learn that objects are not always the way that they appear to be. This occurs when children are able to take in many different aspects of an object, entirely through looking at it. Children are able to begin to imagine different scenarios, or what if something was to happen. This is because they now have more operational thought.Children are generally first able to conserve ideas about objects with which they are most comfortable. Once children have learnt to conserve, they learn about reversibility. This means that they learn that if things are changed, they will still be the same as they used to be. For example, they learn that if they spread out the pile of blocks, there are still as many there as before, even though it looks different Formal Operations Stage (11yrs-16yrs) Finally, in the formal operational stage of adolescence, When faced with a complex problem, the adolescent things about all possible solutions before trying them out in the real world.So when the child has passed through these stages Piaget thinks they are ready for the world and they will be able to sort things out throughout their life. Noam Chomsky Chomsky believes that children are born with an genetic ability to learn any human language. He claims that certain language structures which children use so accurately must be already engraved on the childs mind. Chomsky believes that every child has a language acquisition device or LAD which stores childrens language and structures for them to use and expand victimization their growing vocabulary.Chomsky points out that a child could not possibly learn a language through imitation alone because the language spoken around them is highly irregular adults speech is often broken up and even sometimes ungrammatical. Chomskys theory applies to all languages as they all contain nouns, verbs, consonants and vowels and children appear to be hard-wired to acquire the grammar. Every language is extremely complex, often with subtle distinctions which even essential speakers are unaware of.However, all children, regardless of their intellectual ability, become fluent in their native language within five or six years. Chomsky thinks children learn language quickly and easily, and he thinks language is natural. All babies babble the same sounds, deaf babble. Ive notice children at my placement make grammar mistakes and example would be, a child fell over in the playground and they said I fellded down sort of of saying I feel down so Chomsky thinks children learn this themselves and we influence it as they get elderly because they listen to what we say and then we would say oh have a fell down.So by use saying it the correct way were hoping that the child them remembers this. Evaluation Both Piaget and Chomsky believe that language is just something that children are born with and that its not through nurturing them but they believe that nurturing will help bring on their language and support it. Piaget thinks language development is related to cognitive development, that is, the development of the childs thinking controls when the child can learn to speak and what the child can say.For example, before a child can say, This teddy is smaller than that one, she/he must have developed the ability to judge differences in size. Whereas Chomsky just thinks children will pick up the language but he believe its get influenced but people around but he think vocabulary has to be learned and that grammar is influenced by interaction. Chomsky he thinks children are born with all that is needed to produce language, but Piaget thinks parents and carers reinforce and therefore radiation diagram childrens language.